NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Oppidan Homes Pty Ltd v Yang [2017] NSWCATAP 67 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 29 March 2017 Decision date: 29 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: I Bailey AM SC, Senior Member R Titterton, Senior Member Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NSW) – Home Building - Costs – Appeal – Exercise of discretion – error of law Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Regulation 2009 Cases Cited: Australian Securities Commission v Aust–Home Investments Ltd (1993) 44 FCR 194 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 Johnson t/as One Tree Constructions v Lukeman [2017] NSWCATAP 45 T A & J R O'Keefe Pty Ltd v Benita Holroyd [2015] NSWCATAP 112 Thomson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6 Category: Costs Parties: Oppidan Homes Pty Ltd (Appellant) Tao (Ellen) Yang (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Gerald Aronston (Appellant) Watson & Watson (Respondent) File Number(s): AP 16/45199 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil & Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer & Commercial Division Date of Decision: 15 September 2016 Before: G Meadows, Senior Member File Number(s): HB 12/32522 and HB 12/37224
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate