NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Yarraford Pastoral Co Pty Ltd v Lewington [2017] NSWSC 316 Hearing dates: 9 February 2017 Date of orders: 07 April 2017 Decision date: 07 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted.
(2) Appeal dismissed.
(3) The Plaintiff is to pay the Defendant's costs. Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – appeal from magistrate – application for leave to appeal – issue concerning costs – judgment pronounced by magistrate but no orders as to costs made – application for costs made years later – whether magistrate functus officio – finality principle
PROCEDURE – costs – where costs order sought subsequent to judgment – whether application to vary judgment – whether limitation in r 36.16(3A) UCPR applied – scope of s 98(3) Civil Procedure Act – relationship of s 98(3) to finality principle – whether application could be made under the slip rule Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) High Court Rules 1952 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529 Drummond & Rosen Pty Ltd v Easey [No 2] [2009] NSWCA 331 Grace v Grace (No 9) [2014] NSWSC 1239 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 L Shaddock & Associates Pty Limited v The Council of the City of Parramatta (No 2) (1983) 151 CLR 590 Moustach Pty Ltd v Eddie Takchi [2015] NSWSC 2080 New South Wales Insurance Ministerial Corporation v Edkins (1998) 45 NSWLR 8 Raybos Australia Pty Ltd v Tectran Corporation Pty Ltd (1988) 77 ALR 190 Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales, Council of the Shire of Evans & Pioneer Road Services Pty Ltd v Palmer (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 140 Rodi v Gelonesi [2016] NSWCA 348 Short v Crawley (No. 45) [2013] NSWSC 1541 Yarraford Pastoral Co Pty Ltd v Lewington [2015] NSWSC 522 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Australia) Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 227 Zoef v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 2 Category: Costs Parties: Yarraford Pastoral Co Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Richard Lewington (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Henry SC with Mr T Flaherty (Plaintiff) Mr D A Smallbone (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate