NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Kotevski [1998] NSWCCA 1 Hearing dates: 3 April 1998 Decision date: 03 April 1998 Before: James J at [1]; Hulme J at [34]; Simpson J at [59] Decision: Leave to appeal against sentence granted but appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE – appeal against sentence – malicious wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm – victim was applicant's estranged wife – applicant lost self control while under stress – whether sentencing judge failed sufficiently to take into account applicant's belief that his wife had treated him unfairly – whether sentencing judge should have entered into a determination of the merits of the matrimonial disputes between the applicant and his wife Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 33 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6AA Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Sentencing Act 1989 (NSW), s 5(2) Cases Cited: R v Farroukh (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 29 March 1996, unrep) R v Phelan (1993) 66 A Crim R 446 R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bill Kotevski (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K F Morrissey (Applicant) P G Berman (Respondent)
Solicitors: Stockman & Evans (Applicant) S E O'Connor (Respondent) File Number(s): 60405/97 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Before: Cooper DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate