NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RG v R [2017] NSWCCA 60 Hearing dates: 14 March 2017 Date of orders: 31 March 2017 Decision date: 31 March 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Garling J at [149] Beech-Jones J at [160] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – CONVICTION APPEAL – attempted murder – 30 shots fired through a closed door of a suburban house – female occupant seriously injured – whether intent to murder proved beyond reasonable doubt – whether reasonable possibility of shots having been fired recklessly excluded by the Crown – point not taken at trial – verdict not unreasonable and supported by the evidence – conviction appeal dismissed – SENTENCE APPEAL – whether sentencing judge erred in not taking account of the risk of institutionalisation – risk of institutionalisation not raised in sentence proceedings – whether error in characterising the objective seriousness of offence as being in the worst case category – whether totality principle properly applied – whether sentence manifestly excessive – leave to appeal against sentence granted but appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – ss 18, 29, 33A(l)(a) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – ss 5(1)(b), 5(1)(c) Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW) - r 4 Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) – s 7(1) Cases Cited: Ali v R [2010] NSWCCA 35 Baines v R [2016] NSWCCA 132 Cahyadi v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 1 Cao v Regina [2013] NSWCCA 321 Cutter v The Queen [1997] HCA 7; 143 ALR 498 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Jackson v R [2010] NSWCCA 162 Knight v The Queen [1992] HCA 56; 175 CLR 495 R v Lemene v [2001] NSWCCA 5 Makarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mulato v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 282 Pannowitz v R [2016] NSWCCA 13 Paxton v R [2011] NSWCCA 242; 219 A Crim R 104 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 R v Jennar [2014] NSWCCA 331 R v Koloamatangi [2011] NSWCCA 288 R v MAK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381; 167 A Crim R 159 Regina v Twala (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 4 November 1994, unreported) SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 The Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] HCA 35; 90 ALJR 1013 The Queen v Kilic [2016] HCA 48 Vandeventer v R [2013] NSWCCA 33 Vossos v R [2016] NSWCCA 262 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44; 223 A Crim R 460 Category: Principal judgment Parties: RG – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: B Walker SC/A Djemal – Applicant NJ Adams – Respondent Crown Solicitors: G Goold – Applicant Solicitor for Public Prosecutions – Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2013/155418 Publication restriction: Yes Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 15 May 2015 Before: Hock DCJ File Number(s): 2013/155418
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate