NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Louisiana Properties Pty Ltd v Hakea Holdings Pty Ltd; Hakea Holdings Pty Ltd v Louisiana Properties Pty Ltd [2017] NSWLEC 37 Hearing dates: 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 20 December 2016 Decision date: 29 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Moore J Decision: See directions at [204] and [205] Catchwords: EASEMENT – application pursuant to s 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919 for imposition of an easement – easement sought for the purpose of creating an asset protection zone for bushfire protection – tests in s 88K(1) and (2) considered – tests satisfied – easement ordered EASEMENT – calculation of area for easement – whether whole easement required in perpetuity – valuation of easement – basis of and amount for easement determined CROSS-CLAIM – road constructed by owner of land on land adjoining not owned by it for the purported satisfaction of condition of development consent – whether construction authorised or was construction a trespass – construction not authorised and therefore a trespass – ordinary damages to await outcome of related Land and Environment Court proceedings – modest exemplary damages warranted and awarded – issues of injunctive relief also to await outcome of related Land and Environment Court proceedings – cross-claim adjourned DEVELOPMENT CONSENTS – 2006 development commenced – status of 2006 development consent in light of different 2013 consent that is partially incompatible and which has been implemented – 2006 consent remains on foot – 2006 consent provides for mandated route to adjacent hospital – 2013 consent mandates such access by different route – 2013 consent holder causes road to be conducted along route in 2006 consent – no legal basis to do so – construction also not authorised by Right of Access in favour of 2013 consent holder – discretionary relief matters stood over to further hearing Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919, s 88K Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 79BA, 79C and 124 Wyong Local Environmental Plan 2013, Land Use Table Cases Cited: ABI-K Pty Limited v Frank Shi [2014] NSWSC 551 City of Canterbury v Saad [2013] NSWCA 251 Khattar v Weise [2005] NSWSC 1014 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority 194 CLR 355; 72 ALJR 841; 153 ALR 490; [1998] HCA 28 Rainbowforce Pty Limited v Skyton Holdings Pty Limited and Ors (2010) 171 LGERA 286; [2010] NSWLEC 2 Tregoyd Gardens Pty Limited v Jervis (1997) 8 BPR 15,845 Whitfeld v De Lauret and Company (1920) 29 CLR 71; [1920] HCA 75 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Louisiana Properties Pty Ltd (Applicant in Matter No 322081 of 2016 and Respondent and Cross-claimant in Matter No 261922 of 2016 ) Hakea Holdings Pty Ltd (First Respondent in Matter No 322081 of 2016 and Applicant and Cross-defendant in Matter No 261922 of 2016) Caverstock Group Pty Limited (Second Respondent in Matter No 322081 of 2016) Central Coast Council (Third Respondent in Matter No 322081 of 2016 – submitting appearance) Representation: Counsel: Mr C Ireland, barrister (Louisiana Properties Pty Ltd) Mr T Hale SC and Mr J Tobin, barrister (Hakea Holdings Pty Ltd) Mr A Carney, solicitor (Caverstock Group Pty Limited)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate