NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Brett v Rowland [2017] NSWCATAP 73 Hearing dates: 27 February 2017 Date of orders: 31 March 2017 Decision date: 31 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Hon D Cowdroy OAM ADCJ QC Principal Member G Sarginson, Senior Member Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is refused. 2. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: Appeal---Consumer and Commercial Division of Civil and Administrative Tribunal---Grounds of appeal---No error of law---No substantial miscarriage of justice Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 ss 59, 80, Sch 4 Cl 8, Sch 4 Cl 12 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 R 25 Cases Cited: Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Ryan v BKB Motor Vehicle Repairs Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 39 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tony Brett (Appellant) Tim Rowland (Respondent) Jacques Hollenbach (Respondent) Dane Tutty (Respondent) Representation: Appellant: In person
First Respondent: In person File Number(s): AP 16/51968 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: Not applicable Date of Decision: 01 November 2016 Before: Senior Member M Tibbey File Number(s): Gen 16/38452
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate