NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Yao v Liverpool City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1167 Hearing dates: 23, 24 February 2017 Date of orders: 31 March 2017 Decision date: 31 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Brown C Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Modification application 130/1998/B to modify the hours of operation for an existing brothel at 2/24 Railway Street, Liverpool is refused. 3. The exhibits are returned with the exception of exhibit 4. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: modification to hours of operation for a sex services premises- - whether compatible with surrounding land uses – social impact Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan No 251 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 1997 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 Cases Cited: Martyn v Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 614 Wendy Connolly v Liverpool City Council (10785 of 1997, unreported Category: Principal judgment Parties: Su Ming Yao (Applicant) Liverpool City Council.(Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Gough, solicitor (Applicant) Mr S Nash, barrister.(Respondent)
Solicitors: Storey & Gough (Applicant) Liverpool City Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/163121 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate