NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kostov v YPOL Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 341 Hearing dates: 27 March 2017 Date of orders: 27 March 2017 Decision date: 27 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fagan J Decision: On the plaintiff's application for adjournment:
1. The plaintiff's application for adjournment of the hearing of the notice of motion for contempt is dismissed and the hearing is to proceed on 27 March 2017 as previously ordered.
On the first defendant's notice of motion for contempt of Court charges filed 27 January 2017:
1. The Court declares that between about 2 December 2016 and 12 February 2017 the plaintiff Adriana Kostov committed a contempt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales in that whereas the Honorable Justice Bellew on 1 December 2016 ordered that Adriana Kostov desist from communicating with the first defendant, YPOL Pty Limited, its servants, agents, employees and legal representatives, in connection with proceedings in the Common Law Division of the Court, 2016/00257819 or the subject matter of the proceedings, other than by e mail to the first defendant's solicitors at an address specified in the order, Adriana Kostov did between the said dates communicate with the first defendant by e mail, by telephone and by attendance and by e mail to the first defendant's solicitors other than to the specified address, and by telephone to and attendance on the first defendant's solicitors.
The dates and the particulars of such communications in breach of the order being as particularised in subparagraphs (a) to (xxx) of paragraph 2 of the Amended Statement of Charge filed herein on 15 February 2017 and as further particularised in paragraphs (a) to (h) of paragraph 3 of that Amended Statement of Charge.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate