NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: IAG Limited t/as NRMA Insurance v Al-Kilany [2017] NSWSC 342 Hearing dates: 30 March 2017 Date of orders: 30 March 2017 Decision date: 30 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: 1. The certificate dated 5 August 2016 purportedly issued under s 94(4) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act concerning the claim made by the first defendant be set aside;
2. The first defendant's claim under Chapter 4 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act be re‑determined according to law; and
3. There be no order as to the costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – Assessment under Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 – awarding of buffer for past economic loss – whether compliance with s 126(3) – award of amount for future economic loss – whether compliance with s 126(3) – error of law on face of record established – assessment certificate set aside Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999, s 94, s 123, s 126 Cases Cited: AAMI Ltd v Ali [2012] NSWSC 969 Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Habib & Ors [2015] NSWSC 1719, 73 MVR 412 Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Kerr [2012] NSWCA 13; 83 NSWLR 302 Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Sprod [2012] NSWCA 281; 81 NSWLR 626 Craig v State of South Australia [1995] HCA 58; 184 CLR 163 Graham v Parker (1961) 106 CLR 340 Insurance Australia Ltd v O'Shannessy [2015] NSWSC 1047 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21; 197 CLR 611 Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex Parte Hardiman [1980] HCA 13, 144 CLR 1 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) HCA 43 Category: Principal judgment Parties: IAG Limited t/as NRMA Insurance (Plaintiff) Hussain Al-Kilany (First Defendant) State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Second Defendant) Thomas J Goudkamp in his capacity as Claims Assessor of the State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Robinson SC (Plaintiff) Di Michiel (First Defendant) C Langford (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate