NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Brunner [2017] NSWCATOD 49 Hearing dates: 27 March 2017 Date of orders: 05 April 2017 Decision date: 05 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: The Hon F Marks ADCJ Dr R Napier (Professional Member) Prof R Batey (Professional Member) Y Rowling (Community Member) Decision: The respondent is found guilty of professional misconduct. The respondent is to pay the costs of the complainant agreed in the sum of $2535.50 The proceedings are otherwise dismissed Catchwords: Medical practitioner – admission of professional misconduct – finding of professional misconduct-public interest – proceedings not continued and dismissed-costs order Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966 Cases Cited: HCCC v Do [2014] NSWCA 307 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Complainant) Dr Helmut Brunner (Respondent) Representation: Counsel M Darmody solicitor (Complainant) S Barnes (Respondent):
Solicitors: Health Care Complaints Commission (Complainant) TressCox (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00378778, 1620217 Publication restriction: Non-publication order of the name of or any material which might tend to identify the name of any patient of the respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate