NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Ronald Edward Medich (No. 25) [2017] NSWSC 356 Hearing dates: 5 April 2017 Date of orders: 05 April 2017 Decision date: 05 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: See [9]; [11]; [13]; [19] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Practice and procedure – Directions to jury – Whether a "Murray direction" warranted – Whether jury should be directed that it would be "dangerous to convict" based on the evidence of a co-offender – Whether warnings warranted in respect of two witnesses on the basis that their evidence was unreliable Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: GAR v R (No. 2) [2010] NSWCCA 164 R v Ayoub [2004] NSWCCA 209 R v Baartman [2000] NSWCCA 298 Kanaan & Ors v R [2006] NSWCCA 109 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 Robinson v R [2006] NSWCCA 192 R v Stewart (2001) 52 NSWLR 301; [2001] NSWCCA 260 Stojcevski v R [2012] NSWCCA 27 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Ronald Edward Medich (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms G O'Rourke SC and Ms S Harris (Crown) Mr W Terracini SC, Mr T Quilter and Ms M Curry (Accused)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions New South Wales (Crown) Colin Daley Quinn (Accused) File Number(s): 2010/356916 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate