NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ND v R [2017] NSWCCA 70 Hearing dates: 27 March 2017 Date of orders: 13 April 2017 Decision date: 13 April 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Walton J at [82] R A Hulme J at [83] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against conviction granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – one count of sexual intercourse with a child under 10 – whether verdict was unreasonable or cannot be supported having regard to the evidence – applicant identified a number of inconsistencies in evidence of complainant – inconsistencies in peripheral matters – position of advantage of jury – open to jury to find offence proved beyond reasonable doubt – leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – s 66A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – s 5(1) Cases Cited: R v ND [2016] NSWCCA 103 Rasic v R; Johnny Lee Vella v R; Damien Charles Vella v R [2009] NSWCCA 202 SKA v Regina [2012] NSWCCA 205 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ND – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: T Gartelmann SC – Applicant H Roberts – Respondent Crown
Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW – Applicant Solicitor for Public Prosecutions – Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2013/352176 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 6 November 2015 Before: Norton SC DCJ File Number(s): 2013/352176
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate