NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Iinvest Pty Limited (in liquidation) (No 8) [2017] NSWSC 401 Hearing dates: 16 March 2017 Date of orders: 16 March 2017 Decision date: 16 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: The cross-claimants are to pay 80 per cent of the bank's costs of and incidental to the notice of motion filed on 13 March 2017. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – production of and calls for documents – where discovery has been previously agreed between the parties – where the bank's paper files have been digitised – legitimate forensic purpose test
CIVIL PROCEDURE – further amendment of cross-claim – held that the proposed amendment represents a shift in the cross-claimants' case – findings of generality and embarrassment in the pleadings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Baladjam & Ors [No 37] [2008] NSWSC 1457 R v Saleam [1999] NSWCCA 86 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: James Harker-Mortlock (Applicant) J H M Pty Ltd (Second Applicant)
Iinvest Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (First Respondent) Commonwealth Bank of Australia (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P King (Applicant) Ms Cheeseman SC with J White (Respondent)
Solicitors: Dentons Australia (Applicant) Roderick Storie Solicitors (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/00108514 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate