Application by AMZ pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2017] NSWSC 432

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Application by AMZ pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2017] NSWSC 432 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 19 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Whole case referred to the Court of Criminal Appeal to be dealt with as an appeal against sentence under Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – whether appropriate disparity of sentences between co-offenders Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Pt 7 Div 3, s 79 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 44(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966 (NSW) Cases Cited: AMZ v R [2013] NSWCCA 6 Buttrose v Attorney General of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 221 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 Plaisted v R [2015] NSWCCA 287 Prelipceanu v R [2016] NSWCCA 280 R v Clarke [2013] NSWCCA 260 Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 383; 85 NSWLR 783 Yazdani v R [2016] NSWCCA 194 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AMZ (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: P Lange (Applicant) D Kell SC and R Ranken (Attorney General)