NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: ILS Rehab Pty Ltd v Josephine Borg (as administrator of the estate of the late Damien Robert Borg) [2017] NSWSC 442 Hearing dates: 9 March 2017 Decision date: 21 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: White J Decision: Refer to para [41] of judgment. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – general contractual principles – construction and interpretation of shareholders agreement – no dispute that clause did not accurately reflect parties' intentions –appropriate to make order for rectification – whether clause was void for uncertainty – clause not void for uncertainty as it was capable of being given meaning by the court – not necessary to imply a term – defendant's construction of clause would not produce a commercial result and was not consistent with text and context Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Electronic Industries Ltd v David Jones Ltd (1954) 91 CLR 288; [1954] HCA 69 Hick v Raymond & Reid [1893] AC 22 Upper Hunter County District Council v Australian Chilling and Freezing Co Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 429; [1968] HCA 8 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ILS Rehab Pty Ltd (1st Plaintiff; 3rd Cross-Defendant) Ian Farquharson (2nd Plaintiff; 1st Cross-Defendant) Peter Neville Dangar Reid (3rd Plaintiff; 2nd Cross-Defendant) Josephine Borg (Defendant; Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: J Giles SC with H Grace (Plaintiffs; Cross-Defendants) S O'Brien with J Nathan (Defendant; Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate