NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Munstermann v Rayward; Rayward v Munstermann (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 455 Hearing dates: 31 March 2017 Decision date: 31 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Stevenson J Decision: Final orders made, including that defendant repay loan account of $114,283 Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – oppression suit – first defendant to sell shares in third defendant to plaintiff – first defendant to repay loan account in third defendant – quantum of loan account – whether first defendant agreed that his FBT liability for use of car be debited to loan account Legislation Cited: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Munstermann v Rayward; Rayward v Munstermann [2017] NSWSC 133 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Marcus Otto Munstermann (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Mark Lindsay Rayward (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Mazmark Industries Pty Limited (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant) QIA Group Pty Limited (Third Defendant/Third Cross-Defendant) Fuseworx Pty Limited (Fourth Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A S McGrath SC (Plaintiff, Fourth Defendant and Cross-Defendants) D K L Raphael (First and Second Defendants and Cross-Claimants)
Solicitors: Henry Davis York (Plaintiff, Fourth Defendant and Cross-Defendants) Etienne Lawyers (First and Second Defendants and Cross-Claimants) File Number(s): SC 2015/339876
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate