NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Munstermann v Rayward; Rayward v Munstermann (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 457 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 21 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Stevenson J Decision: Costs to be paid on an indemnity basis Catchwords: COSTS – whether award should be made for indemnity costs – whether defendant defended proceedings and prosecuted cross-claim in circumstances where he should have appreciated there were no prospects of success Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Dean v Stockland Property Management Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] NSWCA 141 Munstermann v Rayward; Rayward v Munstermann (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 455 Munstermann v Rayward; Rayward v Munstermann [2017] NSWSC 133 Ragata Developments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1993) 217 ALR 175 Category: Costs Parties: Marcus Otto Munstermann (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Mark Lindsay Rayward (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Mazmark Industries Pty Limited (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant) QIA Group Pty Limited (Third Defendant/Third Cross-Defendant) Fuseworx Pty Limited (Fourth Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A S McGrath SC (Plaintiff, Fourth Defendant and Cross-Defendants) D K L Raphael (First and Second Defendants and Cross-Claimants)
Solicitors: Henry Davis York (Plaintiff, Fourth Defendant and Cross-Defendants) Etienne Lawyers (First and Second Defendants and Cross-Claimants) File Number(s): SC 2015/339876
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate