NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: CFK v Office of the Children's Guardian [2017] NSWSC 460 Hearing dates: 12 April 2017 Date of orders: 24 April 2017 Decision date: 24 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) Unless the parties approach to be heard within 7 days, CFK is to bear the Guardian's costs, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal against NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal decision re working with children check clearance – whether the Tribunal was bound to accept expert opinion that the applicant posed a low risk of sexual abuse – whether there was a denial of procedural fairness – whether there was failure to give reasons for rejection of expert opinion – whether Tribunal was entitled to reach different conclusions to that reached by the Court of Criminal Appeal – applicant had not pursued counselling and had not disclosed acquittal to employers – whether Tribunal's decision was irrational and illogical – no legal errors established – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: BKE v Office of Children's Guardian & Anor [2015] NSWSC 523 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1988) 60 CLR 336 at 362; [1938] HCA 34 CFK v Office of the Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 140 M v M (1988) 166 CLR 69 at 77; [1988] HCA 68 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Re; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 198 ALR 59; [2003] HCA 30 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB (2004) 78 ALJR 992; [2004] HCA 32 R v War Pensions Entitlement Appeal Tribunal; ex parte Bott (1933) 50 CLR 228; [1933] HCA 30 YG & GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CFK (Applicant) Office of the Children's Guardian (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms J Webb (Applicant) Ms A Douglas-Baker (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate