NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CBL v Southern Cross University [2017] NSWCATAD 125 Hearing dates: 2 March 2017 Date of orders: 24 April 2017 Decision date: 24 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: CBL's application to set aside the decisions of the Tribunal pursuant to subsection 53(4) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 is dismissed. Catchwords: Application to set aside decision - failure to provide written reasons for decision - scope and nature of set aside provisions – application of subsection 53(4) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 - relationship between set aside provisions and appeal rights. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Cases Cited: BTH v The Public Guardian [2017] NSWCATAP 10 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Craig v South Australia (1995) 84 CLR 163 Dornan v Riordan (1990) 24 FCA 564 Moussa Enterprises Pty Ltd v David Stanford and Kelly Stanford [2015] NSWCATAP 99 Page v Southern Cross University [2016] NSWCATAD 199 XDX [2014] NSWCATGD 38 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CBL (Applicant) Southern Cross University (Respondent) Representation: CBL (Applicant in person)
Solicitors: B Atkinson, University Lawyer (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00378530
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate