NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Duffy v R [2017] NSWCCA 77 Hearing dates: 13 March 2017 Decision date: 26 April 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Latham J at [63]; Campbell J at [64] Decision: With respect to the application for leave to appeal against conviction:
(a) Refuse leave pursuant to r 4 of the Criminal Appeal Rules to rely upon grounds 1 and 3, to the extent that the latter involves a challenge to the directions given to the jury. (b) Refuse leave to appeal pursuant to ground 3, pursuant to s 5(1)(b) of the Criminal Appeal Act, in so far as it alleged that the verdict was unreasonable and not supported on the evidence, or otherwise involved a miscarriage of justice. (c) Ground 2 not being pressed, refuse the application for leave to appeal against conviction.
With respect to the application for leave to appeal against sentence:
(a) Grant leave to appeal. (b) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCECURE – leave to appeal against conviction – grounds of appeal not argued at trial – leave required under Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 – whether directions of trial judge resulted in miscarriage of justice
CRIME – appeal – leave to appeal against conviction – applicant convicted of manslaughter under joint criminal enterprise principles – whether trial judge misdirected jury as to what constitutes "participation" in joint criminal enterprise – whether presence during commission of offence sufficient – offender's state of mind as to common purpose
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate