NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: PH v R [2017] NSWCCA 79 Hearing dates: 14 November 2016 Date of orders: 28 April 2017 Decision date: 28 April 2017 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Rothman J at [11]; Button J at [67] Decision: Leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: APPEAL – criminal law – applicant sexually assaulted his three daughters – earlier convictions in relation to daughters of previous relationship – applicant did not give evidence on sentence – sentencing judge doubted history given to psychiatrists – applicant put on notice as to doubt – reliance on infelicitous comment in ex tempore judgment – reliance on manner in which sentencing judge declined to make firm findings on applicant's history – no ground has merit Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61J(1), 61M(2) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 R v Niketic [2002] NSWCCA 425 R v Palu (2002) 134 A Crim R 174; [2002] NSWCCA 381 R v Qutami (2001) 127 A Crim R 369; [2001] NSWCCA 353 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 Category: Principal judgment Parties: PH (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Quiter (Applicant) E Balodis (Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid (NSW) (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/60911 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 12 November 2015 Before: Syme DCJ File Number(s): 2014/60911
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate