NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited v Meredith & Ors [2017] NSWSC 466 Hearing dates: 21 March 2017 Decision date: 26 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: (1) Quash the decision of the third defendant made on 30 June 2016. (2) Remit the matter to the second defendant for allocation to a review panel for determination according to law. (3) Reserve the question of costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – motor accidents compensation scheme – assessment of WPI referred to Review Panel – where several new medical reports indicated that there was a non-organic element to the condition of the first defendant – failure by Review Panel to refer to reports – whether denial of procedural fairness – whether reasons inadequate Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), ss 5, 43, 57A, 58, 60, 63, 131, 133 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531; [2010] HCA 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSSJ [2016] HCA 29 Mahenthirarasa v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (No 2) (2008) 72 NSWLR 273; [2008] NSWCA 201 Moran v Motor Accidents Authority [2013] NSWSC 1135 QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited v Davies [2016] NSWSC 536 RACQ Insurance Limited v Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1126 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82; [2000] HCA 57 Seller v Jones [2014] NSWCA 19 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141; [1986] HCA 54 Wingfoot Australia Partners Proprietary Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480; [2013] HCA 43 Zahed v IAG Limited t/as NRMA Insurance [2016] NSWCA 55 Category: Principal judgment Parties: QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited (Plaintiff) Leza Pam Meredith (First Defendant) The State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Second Defendant) The Medical Assessors Review Panel (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr K P Rewell SC (Plaintiff) Mr T Saunders (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate