NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Huang v Zheng; Zheng v Huang [2017] NSWSC 471 Hearing dates: 27, 28 February; 1, 2 and 3 March 2017 Decision date: 27 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: White J Decision: Refer to para [91] of judgment. Catchwords: EQUITY – trusts and trustees – where plaintiff provided purchase moneys for property purchased in name of father which was transferred to defendant upon father's death and according to father's will – whether presumption of resulting trust rebutted
REAL PROPERTY – Torrens title – whether defendant's title is indefeasible – whether dishonest repudiation of a prior interest amounts to fraud for the purposes of s 42 of Real Property Act – whether plaintiff's reliance on representations made by defendant that defendant would recognise plaintiff as the true owner gives rise to equitable estoppel – whether plaintiff's in personam rights defeat defendant's title
EQUITY – general principles – equitable doctrines – whether illegal purpose precludes relief – where plaintiff purchased property in father's name in order to obtain grants and stamp duty exemption – whether scope and purpose of the First Home Owner Grant Act 2000 (NSW) requires that plaintiff be denied interest in the property
CONTRACT – whether money transfers were a gift or a loan Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Duties Act 1997 (NSW) First Home Owner Grant Act 2000 (NSW) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No. 5) (1996) 64 FCR 73 Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242; [1984] HCA 81 Carantinos v Magafas [2008] NSWCA 304 Dominelli Ford (Hurstville) Pty Ltd v Karmot Auto Spares Pty Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 471 Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101; [1999] HCA 10 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215; [1985] HCA 75 Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538; [1995] HCA 25 Plunkett v Bull (1915) 19 CLR 544; [1915] HCA 14 Priestley v Priestley [2016] NSWSC 1096 Ryan v Starr [2005] NSWSC 170; (2005) 12 BPR 22,803 Sze Tu v Lowe (2014) 89 NSWLR 317; [2014] NSWCA 462 Texts Cited: A Silink, "Causation in Equitable Estoppel" (2016) 43 (3) Aust Bar Rev 320 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joseph Huai Huang (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) David Xiao Zheng (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: J E Thomson (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) M K Condon SC (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate