NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kelly v R [2017] NSWCCA 82 Hearing dates: 20 March 2017 Date of orders: 01 May 2017 Decision date: 01 May 2017 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Walton J at [4]; Price J at [5] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – aggravated enter dwelling with intent – armed robbery – whether error in taking into account prior criminal history in assessing objective seriousness of offences – whether error in application of Henry guideline judgment in assessing indicative sentence for robbery – re-sentence – whether lesser sentence should be imposed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900, ss 97(1), 111(2), 117, 344A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 53A(1) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998, s 7(1) Cases Cited: Adegoke v R [2013] NSWCCA 193 JM v R (2014) 246 A Crim R 528; [2014] NSWCCA 297 Kentwell v R (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v McNaughten (2006) 66 NSWLR 566; [2006] NSWCCA 242 R v Walker [2005] NSWCCA 109 Veen v R (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Steven John Kelly (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M J Paingakulum (Applicant) Mr E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate