NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Page v Southern Cross University [2017] NSWCATAP 89 Hearing dates: 17 March 2017 Date of orders: 28 April 2017 Decision date: 28 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: K O'Connor, AM, ADCJ, Deputy President, Appeals Dr J Lucy, Senior Member Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: GOVERNMENT INFORMATION (PUBLIC ACCESS) – Reviewability of decisions as to discounts and advance deposits – Appeal – Law provides for discounts for financial hardship and special public benefit – Whether reviewable decisions to impose a processing charge and to refuse a reduction in a processing charge may be made before access application determined – Finding that they may not be - Agency purported to grant a financial hardship discount - a second discount on the ground of special public benefit is not available – Adequacy of an agency's notice requiring an advance deposit is not reviewable - Appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Government Information (Public Access) Regulation 2009 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Interpretation Act 1987 Cases Cited: BY v Director General, Attorney General's Department [2002] NSWADT 79 National Tertiary Education Union v Southern Cross University [2015] NSWCATAD 151 Page v Southern Cross University [2016] NSWCATAD 199 Project Blue Sky v ABA [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355; 153 ALR 490; 72 ALJR 841 Texts Cited: Bennion, Statutory Interpretation (3rd ed. 1997) Category: Principal judgment Parties: James Smith Page (Appellant) Southern Cross University (Respondent) Representation: In person (Appellant) B Atkinson, Legal Officer (Respondent) File Number(s): AP 16/46936 Publication restriction: Suppression Order has been made under s64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 in respect of part of the contents of paragraphs 2 and 9 of the Reasons. Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Citation: [2016] NSWCATAD 199 Date of Decision: 31 August 2016 Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member File Number(s): 1510627
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate