Naden v Parole Authority of New South Wales [2017] NSWSC 479

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Naden v Parole Authority of New South Wales [2017] NSWSC 479 Hearing dates: 6 March 2017 Decision date: 27 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Latham J Decision: Application Dismissed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application under s155 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act) –whether Parole Authority for NSW relied on false, misleading or irrelevant information – scope of review of Parole Authority decisions – insufficient evidence advanced to support application - application dismissed. Legislation Cited: Court (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s155 Cases Cited: Attorney General for New South Wales v New South Wales State Parole Authority [2006] NSWSC 865 Clark v State Parole Authority of New South Wales and Anor [2011] NSWSC 1220 DCU v State Parole Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 526 Lee v State Parole Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 1225 McCafferty v Offenders Review Board (Court of Criminal Appeal, 19 June 1995, unreported) McCallum v Parole Board of NSW [2003] NSWCCA 294 McPherson v Offenders Review Board (1991) 23 NSWLR 61 R v Naudi [2003] NSWCCA 160 Radford v Parole Board [2002] NSWCCA 70 Rozynski v Parole Board of New South Wales [2003] NSWCCA 214 Sutton v New South Wales State Parole Authority [2011] NSWSC 935 Terry Sampson v NSW State Parole Authority [2012] NSWSC 933 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kyran Hubert John Naden (plaintiff) Parole Authority of New South Wales (first defendant) Attorney-General for New South Wales (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Davidson (second defendant)