NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: James v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2017] NSWCA 84 Hearing dates: 26 April 2017 Decision date: 26 April 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Simpson JA at [26] Decision: (1) Refuse the applicant an extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal from the judgment of Ball J of 23 June 2016.
(2) Order that the applicant pay the respondents' costs in this Court. Catchwords: APPEAL – application for leave to appeal – judgment as to costs alone – leave required under Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 101(2)(c) – challenge to gross sum costs order – whether issue of principle or general public importance – whether insufficient evidence for informed costs assessment by primary judge – whether factual errors warranting intervention
APPEAL – application for leave to appeal – application filed out of time – whether appropriate to grant extension of time – whether appropriate to refuse extension where leave to appeal would be refused
COSTS – gross sum costs order – whether proper exercise of power – whether insufficient evidence to determine reasonable amount – whether amount paid could form basis of calculation in absence of information as to work done – Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98(4)(c) Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 60, 98; Pt 6 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Cases Cited: Be Financial Pty Ltd v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Ltd t/a Bennetts Green Bowl [1995] NSWCA 69 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 303; [2013] HCA 46 Gibson v McIntosh [2015] NSWCA 112 Jaycar Pty Ltd v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v ESSO Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 564; [2000] FCA 1572 The Age Company Ltd v Liu (2013) 82 NSWLR 268; [2013] NSWCA 26 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: David Anthony James (Applicant) Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (First Respondent) Paul Merryweather and Greg Hall (Second Respondents) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Baird (Applicant) Mr R M Foreman (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate