NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Saravinovski v Saravinovska [2017] NSWCA 85 Hearing dates: 15 February 2017; 16 February 2017 Decision date: 04 May 2017 Before: Beazley ACJ at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Emmett AJA at [43] Decision: In the Mortgage Appeal: The proceedings be dismissed. The appellant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.
In the Property Appeal: The proceedings be dismissed. The appellant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: PROPERTY – mortgages – whether valid and enforceable mortgage – whether loans purported to be secured by the mortgage were in fact made – whether intention to create legal relations – whether appellant discharged evidentiary onus
FAMILY LAW – ss 5(2)(a), 20 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW) – whether parties in a 'domestic relationship' – whether parties in a 'close and personal relationship' – whether respondent provided domestic services for fee or reward – whether primary judge erred in assessment of parties' financial and non-financial contributions – whether primary judge erred in exercising discretion under s 20 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW), ss 5, 20 Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 3(3), s 3(4) Succession Amendment (Family Provision) Act 2008 (NSW) Cases Cited: Barns v Barns (2003) 214 CLR 169; [2003] HCA 9 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153; [2001] NSWCA 61 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 389; [1996] HCA 36 Evans v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2012] FCAFC 81; (2012) 289 ALR 237 Holmes v Permanent Trustee Co of New South Wales Ltd (1932) 47 CLR 113; [1932] HCA 1 House v the King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corp (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 11,110 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v A M Satterthwaite & Co Ltd [1975] AC 154; [1974] UKPC 1 Re Filomena Rodi, decd [2016] NSWSC 1696 Sarkis v Morrison [2013] NSWCA 281 Skarica v Toska [2014] NSWSC 34 South Australian Commissioner for Prices and Consumer Affairs v Charles Moore (Aust) Ltd (1977) 139 CLR 449; [1977] HCA 38 Victims Compensation Fund Corporation v Brown [2003] HCA 54; 77 ALJR 1797 White v O'Neill [2010] NSWSC 1193 Ye v Fung [2006] NSWSC 243 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Chris (Krste) Saravinovski (by his tutor Louie Saravinovski) (Appellant in 2016/239390) Maria Saravinovska (As Executrix of the Estate of the Late George Saravinovski) (Respondent in 2016/239390)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate