NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Gaetano VITALE; R v Angelo VITALE; R v Mark SCALIA [2015] NSWDC 424 Hearing dates: 27 – 29 July 2015 Date of orders: 30 July 2015 Decision date: 30 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Yehia SC DCJ Decision: Admissibility of expert evidence. Catchwords: Application of a ratio to determine the quantity of drugs manufactured; admissibility of expert evidence under sections 79; 135 and 137; "knowledge" under section 79 is "any body of known facts or any body of ideas inferred from such facts accepted as truths on good grounds". Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 79, 135, 137 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) s 24(2) Cases Cited: Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawcher [2011] HCA 21 Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals 509 US 579 (1993) Dupas v The Queen [2012] VSCA 328 Hannes v The DPP [2006] NSWCCA 373 Honeysett v The Queen [2014] HCA 29 Kumho Tire Co Ltd v Carmichael 526 US 137 (1999) Makita Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Regina v Shamouil [2006] NSWCCA 112 R v Burton [2013] NSWCCA 335 R v Tang [2006] NSWCCA 167 R v XY [2013] NSWCCA 121 Tuite v The Queen [2015] VSCA 148 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Gaetano Vitale (Accused) Angelo Vitale (Accused) Mark Scalia (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Patch (Crown) Mr P Kintominos (Scalia) Ms K Stares (A Vitale) Mr A Boe with Ms McGee (G Vitale) File Number(s): 2013/193921, 2013/277706, 2013/273903
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate