NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cassaniti v Ruse NSW Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 499 Hearing dates: 26 April 2017 Date of orders: 01 May 2017 Decision date: 01 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Pembroke J Decision: Separate question answered in the negative Catchwords: DEED – construction and implication – reasonable and effective operation – commercial purpose – neither obvious nor necessary DEED – mere contractual obligation by entities not having interest in land – not capable of creating equitable interest in land in favour of promisee Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australis Media Holdings Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 104 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ivana Cassaniti – first plaintiff Gino Robert Cassaniti – second plaintiff Ruse NSW Pty Limited – first defendant Armstrong Scalisi Holdings Pty Limited – second defendant Raptor (Aust) Pty Ltd – third defendant Leumeah (NSW) Pty Ltd – fourth defendant Newton Road WP Pty Ltd – fifth defendant David Salvatore Cassaniti – sixth defendant Sam Peter Cassaniti – seventh defendant Representation: Counsel: J Thomson with K Young – for the plaintiffs M Ashhurst SC with L Corbett – for the defendants
Solicitors: Dormer Stanhope – for the plaintiffs Kemp Strang – for the defendants File Number(s): 2015/377309
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate