NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nancarrow v Donvito [2017] NSWCATAP 97 Hearing dates: 10 March 2017 Date of orders: 03 May 2017 Decision date: 03 May 2017 Before: Hon F Marks, Principal Member T Simon, Senior Member Decision: (1) The appeal is allowed (2) The order made by the Member in COM 16/20259 is quashed (3) The matter is referred to the Consumer and Commercial Division to be determined by a different Member Catchwords: Appeal-failure to give reasons-appeal as of right-further disposition of proceedings - Dividing Fences Act application-held existing fence sufficient dividing fence- Application remitted for further hearing Legislation Cited: Dividing Fences Act Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act Cases Cited: Larney v Johannson [2013] NSWCA 409 Pollard v RRR Corporation Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 110 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP17 Lindsay v Johnston [2014] NSWCATCD 45 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jason Nancarrow and Michelle Black (appellants) John Donvito and Dianne Wilder (respondents) Representation: Appellant in person Respondent in person File Number(s): AP 16/55084 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 8 December 2016 Before: K Holwell General Member File Number(s): COM 16/20259
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate