NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Legal Services Commissioner v Huggett [2017] NSWCATOD 67 Hearing dates: 31 March 2017 Date of orders: 04 May 2017 Decision date: 04 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: K O'Connor, AM, ADCJ, Deputy President M Sindler, Senior Member E Hayes, General Member Decision: The respondent is found guilty of professional misconduct, and the Tribunal orders: 1. That he be reprimanded. 2. That he undertake a professional education course in ethics and integrity, as approved by the applicant in consultation with the Law Society. 3. That he pay a fine of $2,500. 4. That he pay the applicant its costs of the proceedings, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT – Legal Profession – Solicitor advising clients to sign statutory declaration in the absence of an authorised witness– Advising he would witness signatures on return of documents – non-compliance with Oaths Act - Whether in circumstances professional misconduct or unsatisfactory professional conduct – Held professional misconduct - Orders made. Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) No 16a Oaths Act 1900 Cases Cited: Allinson v General Council of Medical Education and Registration [1894] 1 QB 750 Council of the Law Society of NSW v Chau [2011] NSWADT 271 Council of the Law Society of NSW v Ly [2011] NSWADT 210 Council of the Law Society of NSW v Martin [2012] NSWADT 22 Council of the Law Society of NSW v Orford [2016] NSWCATOD 22. Fraser v The Law Society [1992] NSWLST 6 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Legal Services Commissioner (Applicant) Garry John Huggett (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Lynch SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate