NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hancock v Rinehart (Freehills subpoena) [2017] NSWSC 530 Hearing dates: 30 March 2017 Date of orders: 04 May 2017 Decision date: 04 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Brereton J Decision: See [65]. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – privilege – legal professional privilege – subpoenas – application to set aside subpoena alleging abuse of process and privilege – not a collateral attack on a previous order – held, not an abuse of process -- if documents privileged, no waiver in the circumstances – applicant fails to establish privilege against respondent in respect of contested documents – held, subpoena not set aside. Cases Cited: Attorney-General for the Northern Territory v Kearney (1985) 158 CLR 500 AWB Ltd v Cole (No 5) [2006] FCA 1234 BBGP Managing General Partner Ltd v Babcock & Brown Global Partners [2011] Ch 296; [2011] 2 All ER 297 British Coal Corp v Dennis Rye Ltd (No 2) [1988] 1 WLR 1113; [1988] 3 All ER 816 Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501; [1997] HCA 3 Cook v Pasminco Pty Ltd (No 2) (2000) 107 FCR 44 CSR Ltd v Eddy (2008) 70 NSWLR 725; [2008] NSWCA 83 D A Christie Pty Ltd v Baker [1996] 2 VR 582 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited (2013) 250 CLR 303; (2013) 303 ALR 199; (2013) 88 ALJR 76; [2013] HCA 46 Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd (in liq) v Webb (1996) 39 NSWLR 601 Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83; 132 ALR 57 Goldman v Hesper [1988] 1 WLR 1238; [1988] 3 All ER 97 Gotha City v Sotheby's [1998] 1 WLR 114 Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674 Hancock v Rinehart (Privilege) [2016] NSWSC 12 Hancock v Rinehart [2015] NSWSC 1311 Hastie Group Limited v Moore [2016] NSWCA 305 Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd v Harrison (The "Sagheera") [1997] 1 Lloyd's Rep 160 Holmes v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1987) 19 ATR 1278 Lazenby v Zammit [1987] Tas R 54 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1; 168 ALR 86; [1999] HCA 66 National Crime Authority v S (1991) 29 FCR 203; 100 ALR 151; [1991] FCA 234 Nominal Defendant v Manning [2000] NSWCA 80; (2000) 50 NSWLR 139 Osland v Secretary Department of Justice [2008] HCA 37; (2008) 234 CLR 275; (2008) 249 ALR 1; (2008) 82 ALJR 1288 Pascoe v Boensch [2007] FMCA 1214 Rinehart v Rinehart [2016] NSWCA 58 Schreuder v Murray (No 2) (2009) 260 ALR 139; 41 WAR 169; [2009] WASCA 145 Thomason v Campbelltown Municipal Council (1939) 39 SR(NSW) 347 TSB Bank plc v Robert Irving & Burns [2000] 2 All ER 826 Wentworth v De Montfort (1988) 15 NSWLR 348 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: John Langley Hancock (first plaintiff) Bianca Hope Rinehart (second plaintiff) Gina Hope Rinehart (first defendant) Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd (fourth defendant) Representation: Counsel: C. Withers w P. Meagher (plaintiffs) B.R. McClintock SC w R. Mansted (first defendant) J. Giles SC w T. O'Brien (fourth defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate