NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Butler Street Community Network Incorporated v Northern Region Joint Regional Planning Panel [2017] NSWLEC 51 Hearing dates: 28 April 2017 Date of orders: 05 May 2017 Decision date: 05 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Robson J Decision: See orders at [49] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – development consent by a public authority for the purposes of a road – whether the Court has jurisdiction where the bulk of the development is permissible without consent Legislation Cited: Byron Local Environmental Plan 2014 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) ss 80, 98 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW) cl 55 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) s 39 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 (NSW) r 3.7 State Environmental Planning Policy No 14 – Coastal Wetlands (NSW) cl 7 State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007 (NSW) cll 8, 94 Cases Cited: Addenbrooke Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 134 Calvin v Carr (1979) 1 NSWLR 1 Chambers v Maclean Shire Council [2003] NSWCA 100; (2003) 126 LGERA 7 Currey v Sutherland Shire Council and Russell [2003] NSWCA 300; (2003) 129 LGERA 223 Ervin Mahrer and Partners v Strathfield Municipal Council (No 2) [2001] NSWLEC 140; (2001) 115 LGERA 259 Hoxton Park Residents Action Group Inc v Liverpool City Council [2011] NSWCA 349; (2011) 184 LGERA 104 Lend Lease Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council (1997) 92 LGERA 420 Radray Constructions Pty Ltd v Hornsby Council [2006] NSWLEC 155; (2006) 145 LGERA 292 Rogers v Clarence Valley Council [2011] NSWLEC 134; (2011) 185 LGERA 37 The Council of the City of Parramatta v Precision Rubber Service Pty Limited [1995] NSWLEC 34 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Butler Street Community Network Incorporated (Applicant) Northern Region Joint Regional Planning Panel (First Respondent) GHD Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Byron Shire Council (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: F Berglund with N Hammond (Applicant) L Sims, solicitor (First Respondent) A Galasso SC (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate