NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Miao v R [2017] NSWCCA 89 Hearing dates: 15 March 2017 Decision date: 10 May 2017 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Latham J at [2]; Campbell J at [56] Decision: Leave granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - use a carriage service to access child pornography - possess child abuse material and like offence taken into account on Form 1 - whether an inadequate discount was applied - whether the objective criminality was properly assessed - whether an Intensive Corrections Order should have been considered - whether the sentence was manifestly excessive - leave to appeal granted - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Code 1995 (Cth); s 474.19; 17A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW): s 91H Crimes (Sentencing Procedures) Act 1999 (NSW); ss 7, 12 Cases Cited: Fedele v R [2015] NSWCCA 286 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; 195 A Crim R 1 Atkinson v R [2014] NSWCCA 262 Villalon v R [2015] NSWCCA 229 R v Oinonen [1999] NSWCCA 310 R v Cardoso [2003] NSWCCA 15; 137 A Crim R 535 Burbridge v R [2016] NSWCCA 128 R v Porte [2015] NSWCCA 174 Douar v R [2005] NSWCCA 455; 159 A Crim R 154 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 R v Wegener [1999] NSWCCA 405 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Zhiguo Miao (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Kluss (Applicant) L Crowley (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate