NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Agius; R v Castagna [2017] NSWSC 549 Hearing dates: 23 March 2017 Date of orders: 24 March 2017 Decision date: 24 March 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: Application for separate trial dismissed Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for separate trial – no prejudice established to justify separate trial – joint trial in the interests of justice Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: R v Agius; R v Zerafa [2012] NSWSC 978 R v Baladjam & Ors (No.57) [2008] NSWSC 1471 R v Hiroki [2014] NSWSC 365 R v Middis (Supreme Court, 27 March 1991, unreported) R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No.3) [2015] NSWSC 965 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Queen Robert Francis Agius (Applicant on the Motion) Anthony Dante Castagna Representation: Counsel: P McGuire SC (Crown) P Lowe (Agius) P Strickland SC (Castagna)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) David H Cohen & Co Solicitors (Agius) Hazan Hollander Solicitors & Intellectual Property (Castagna) File Number(s): 2016/136935;2016/137095 Publication restriction: Not to be published until after finalisation of the trial. Trial finalised - non-publication order revoked on 24.8.2020.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate