NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Raad v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2017] NSWDC 94 Hearing dates: 24 April 2017 Date of orders: 02 May 2017 Decision date: 02 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Dicker SC DCJ Decision: (1) The parties should bring in Short Minutes of Order reflecting the award of 4% per annum interest on the damages amount of $20,000; (2) Order 3 of the orders made on 23 March 2017 is vacated; (3) The defendant is to pay 90% of the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: Interest - pre-judgment – tort of false imprisonment – whether the court rates should be used or rates similar to those for non-economic loss
Costs – where plaintiff has not succeeded on some aspects of case including some torts alleged – whether the defendant should be ordered to pay only a proportion of the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Cases Cited: Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 85 McLaughlin v Dungowan Manly Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 306 Metropolitan Meat Industry Board v Williams (1991) 24 NSWLR 54 Moran v State of New South Wales [2017] NSWDC 19 MPB (SA) Pty Ltd v Gogic (1991) 171 CLR 657 Shield Mercantile v Citigroup [2013] NSWSC 287 State of New South Wales v Abed [2014] NSWCA 419 Category: Costs Parties: Johnny Raad (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Canceri (Plaintiff) M Hutchings (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate