NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bicheno Investments Pty Ltd v David John Winterbottom [2017] NSWSC 536 Hearing dates: 1 and 2 May 2017 Date of orders: 09 May 2017 Decision date: 09 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: McDougall J Decision: Summons dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – construction and interpretation of fee deed – whether language of deed ambiguous – whether defendants' entitlement to an incentive required conduct of a physical stock take – use of text, context and purpose – where one construction would lead to commercial absurdity Cases Cited: Codelfa Construction Pty Limited v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337 Mainteck Services Pty Ltd v Stein Heurtey SA (2014) 89 NSWLR 633 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104 Provincial Insurance Australia Pty Ltd v Consolidated Wood Products Pty Ltd (1991) 25 NSWLR 541 Victoria v Tatts Group Ltd (2016) 90 ALJR 392 Zhang v ROC Services (NSW) Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 370 Texts Cited: Macquarie Dictionary Oxford English Dictionary Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bicheno Investments Pty Ltd (1st Plaintiff) Stock Suppliers Australia Pty Limited (2nd Plaintiff) David John Winterbottom (1st Defendant) Rahul Goyal (2nd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R J Weber SC with J A C Potts SC and P D Reynolds (Plaintiffs) J R Williams with J S Burnett (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate