NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Keegan-Jaques v Commissioner of Police [2017] NSWCATAD 145 Hearing dates: 13 February 2017 and 20 March 2017 Date of orders: 09 May 2017 Decision date: 09 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Scahill, Senior Member Decision: Respondent's decision affirmed Catchwords: Firearms licence revocation- not in the public interest Legislation Cited: Administrative Decision Tribunal Act 1997 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2006 Cases Cited: Bottomley v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2005] NSWADT 211 Brosowski v Commissioner of Police [2003] NSWADT 182 Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor and Others (1995) 131 ALR 657 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police v Lee NSW [2016] NSWCATAP 234 Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9 Cusumano v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2001] NSWADT 50 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] AATA 179, (1979) 46 FLR 409 Hijazi v Commissioner of Police [2014] NSWCATAD 148 Martin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2010] NSWADT 276 Petas v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2013] NSWADT 137 Potts v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2010] NSWADT 311 Tannous v Commissioner of Police [2011] NSWADT116 Ward v Commissioner of Police [2000] NSW ADT 28 Wilkinson v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2002] NSWADT 59 Wiltshire v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2005] NSWADT 75 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jason Gregory Keegan-Jaques (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Ewell (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate