NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Fitzpatrick [2016] NSWLC 27 Hearing dates: 20 September 2016 Decision date: 20 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Richardson LCM Decision: Application refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – applications – disqualification for apprehended bias – hearing following preliminary hearing where magistrate exposed to material said to be prejudicial – link to potential for bias in decision-making not identified Cases Cited: AB v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2016] NSWCA 73 Antoun v The Queen [2006] HCA 2 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63 Gaudie v Local Court of NSW [2013] NSWSC 1425 Hammond v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2016] NSWSC 701 Livesey v NSW Bar Association [1983] HCA 17 R v Merrick (No 4) [2016] NSWSC 309 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (prosecution/respondent) Brett Fitzpatrick (first accused/applicant) Saomaauga Faitua (second accused/applicant) Andrew Chasle (third accused/applicant) Christopher Fretton-Anae (fourth accused/applicant) Paul Hammond (fifth accused/applicant) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Gartelmann (for the first accused/applicant) Mr S Russell (for the other accused/applicants)
Solicitors: Ms C Hurford (for the prosecution/respondent) File Number(s): 2015/245077, 2015/242816, 2015/249916, 2015/245123, 2015/172531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate