NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Panayi v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2017] NSWCA 93 Hearing dates: 19 April 2017 Decision date: 10 May 2017 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [62]; Simpson JA at [81] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: TAX AND DUTIES – income tax and related legislation – Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) – where company fails to remit tax withheld from employees to Commissioner of Taxation – where penalty imposed on appellant as director – whether appellant was appointed or acted as director – whether illness or some other good reason made it unreasonable to expect appellant to take part in the management of the company – whether unamended form of s 269-30 applied to remit appellant's liability
EVIDENCE – admissibility – hearsay rule – where ASIC decision and reasons for disqualifying director from managing companies admitted over separate and erroneous objection – whether business records exception applied
STATUTES – acts of parliament – where conditions for remission of liability not satisfied before amendment – whether presumption against retrospectivity engaged – whether meaning of provision governing application of amended form of s 269-30 is clear and unambiguous Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth) s 102 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 56 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 5B, 206F, 533, 1274B Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 3, 59, 69, 91 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), Sch 1, ss 269-15, 269-20, 269-30, 269-35 Tax Laws Amendment (2012 Measures No 2) Act (2012) (Cth), s 3, Sch 1, Div 3, Items 8, 9 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 51.36, 51.53 Cases Cited: Abbott v Minister for Lands [1895] AC 425 Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (2009) 239 CLR 27; [2009] HCA 41 Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485 Colley v Futurebrand FHA Pty Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 291; [2005] NSWCA 223 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Woodhams (2000) 199 CLR 370; [2000] HCA 10 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd (2011) 193 FCR 149; [2011] FCAFC 74 Gray t/as Clarence Valley Plumbing Services v Ware Building Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 271 Maxwell v Murphy (1957) 96 CLR 261 Perish v R (2016) 92 NSWLR 161; [2016] NSWCCA 89 Roche v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2015] WASCA 196 Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuinness (2000) 49 NSWLR 262; [2000] NSWCA 29 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Panayi (Appellant) Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P E King (Appellant) J Mitchell (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate