NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bligh Consulting Pty Ltd v Ausgrid [2017] NSWCA 95 Hearing dates: 15 - 16 March 2017 Decision date: 11 May 2017 Before: McColl JA at [1] Basten JA at [2] Sackville AJA at [19] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. The appellant (Bligh Consulting) pay the costs of the respondent (Ausgrid) of the appeal. Catchwords: COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – acquisition of crane swing, rock anchor and scaffolding easements – whether primary Judge erred in rejecting injurious affection claim under s 55(f) of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW) (Just Terms Act) – whether primary Judge failed to apply "before" and "after" test in assessing compensation – whether primary Judge applied the wrong test in determining whether a tenant would vacate the servient tenement in consequence of the proposal to carry out a public purpose rock anchor easement – whether s 62 of the Just Terms Act applies to a rock anchor easement Legislation Cited: Access to Neighbouring Land Act 2000 (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 88K Electricity Supply Act 1995 (NSW) Energy Services Corporations Act 1995 (NSW), s 6A, Sch 1 Pt 1A Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW), ss 3(1), 4, 37, 39, 55, 57, 62(1), 66(1), Pt 3 Div 4 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), ss 19, 24, 57
New South Wales Government Gazette, No 66, 8 August 2014 Cases Cited: Besmaw Pty Ltd v Sydney Water Corporation [2001] NSWLEC 15; 113 LGERA 246 Bligh Consulting Pty Ltd v Ausgrid [2016] NSWLEC 75; 217 LGERA 258 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v FH Faulding & Co Ltd (2000) 97 FCR 524; [2000] FCA 316 Commonwealth v State of New South Wales (1923) 33 CLR 1 Cranbrook School v Woollahra Municipal Council (2006) 66 NSWLR 379; [2006] NSWCA 155 Housing Commission of New South Wales v Falconer [1981] 1 NSWLR 547; 50 LGRA 334 ISPT Pty Ltd v Valuer General [2009] NSWCA 31; 165 LGERA 25 Kenny & Good Pty Ltd v MGICA (1992) Ltd (1999) 199 CLR 413; [1999] HCA 25 Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2003) 212 CLR 111; [2003] HCA 8 Melwood Units Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Main Roads [1979] AC 426 Mir Bros Unit Constructions Pty Ltd v Roads & Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWCA 314 Northern Territory of Australia v Arnhem Land Aboriginal Land Trust (2008) 236 CLR 24; [2008] HCA 29 Pennant Hills Golf Club Ltd v Roads and Traffic Authority (NSW) [1999] NSWCA 110; 9 BPR 17,011 Risk v Northern Territory of Australia (2002) 210 CLR 392; [2002] HCA 23 Roads and Maritime Services v Allandale Blue Metal Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 7; 212 LGERA 307 Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales v Peak [2007] NSWCA 66 Roden v Bandora Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 220 Spencer v The Commonwealth (1907) 5 CLR 418; [1907] HCA 82 Sydney Water Corporation v Besmaw Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 147 Sydney Water Corporation v Caruso [2009] NSWCA 391; 170 LGERA 298 Sydney Water Corporation v Marrickville Council [2014] NSWCA 438 Telstra Corporation Ltd v Treloar (2000) 102 FCR 595; [2000] FCA 1170 Turner v Minister of Public Instruction (1956) 95 CLR 245 Valuer General of New South Wales v Oriental Bar Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 48 Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority (2008) 233 CLR 259; [2008] HCA 5 Wu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 105 FCR 39; [2000] FCA 1817 YZ Finance Co Pty Ltd v Cummings (1964) 109 CLR 395 Texts Cited: D C Pearce and R S Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia, (8th ed 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths) at [6.2] R Cross and JW Harris, Precedent in English Law, (4th ed 1991, Clarendon Press, Oxford) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bligh Consulting Pty Ltd (Appellant) Ausgrid (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Walker SC / Ms J McKelvey (Appellant) Mr I Hemmings SC/ Mr DC Norton (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate