NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Falkenhagen v Perpetual Trustee Company Limited [2017] NSWSC 580 Hearing dates: 10 May 2017 Date of orders: 10 May 2017 Decision date: 10 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Lindsay J Decision: The administration of a trust may be brought to a practical conclusion, notwithstanding a beneficiary's inability to terminate the trust by invocation of the rule in Saunders v Vautier, by means of partial administration orders (under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW, rule 54.3) directing the trustee to distribute trust property when: (a) contingencies which impede termination of the trust are so remote as to be disregarded as a matter of practical certainty; and (b) those contingencies can be accommodated by an undertaking by the beneficiary to account for trust property in the event that, contrary to expectations, such a contingency occurs. Catchwords: EQUITY — Trusts and trustees — Termination of trust — Rule in Saunders v Vautier — Assignment of respective interests to principal beneficiary who holds life estate unavailable – Possibility new beneficiary may arise – Partial administration orders – Distribution of trust property – Effective end to administration of trust
EQUITY — Trusts and trustees — Partial administration orders — Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW, rule 54.3 - Distribution of trust property – Protection of contingent rights — Contingencies remote — Undertaking by plaintiff beneficiary to account for distributed trust property if required — Inappropriate for court to require undertakings detrimental to personal relationships — Undertaking to account sufficient — Protection of trustee – Judicial advice Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW Cases Cited: Bullas v Public Trustee [1981] 1 NSWLR 641 CPT Custodian Pty Limited v Commissioner of State Revenue (2005) 224 CLR 98 Gonzales v Claridades (2003) 58 NSWLR 188 Macrae v Walsh (1927) SR (NSW) 290 National Trustees Executors & Agency Co Ltd v Tuck [1967] VR 847 Re Bruxner [2010] NSWSC 718 Re Cassidy (deceased) [1979] VR 369 Re Estate late Chow Cho-Poon; Application for judicial advice [2013] NSWSC 844 Re Schneider [2009] NSWSC 566; (2009) 3 ASTLR 61 Saunders v Vautier (1841) 4 Beav 115; 49 ER 282 (affirmed (1841) Cr & Ph 240; 41 ER 482) Simpson v Trust Company Fiduciary Services Limited [2009] NSWSC 912 Trustees Executors and Agency Co Ltd v Margottini [1960] VR 417 Wilcox v Poole [1974] 2 NSWLR 693 Texts Cited: Thomas on Powers (1998), page 176 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: BH Falkenhagen Defendant: Perpetual Trustee Company Limited 000 001 007 Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: A Joseph Second Defendant: P O'Loughlin
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate