NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited; Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited v Zepinic [2017] NSWSC 582 Hearing dates: 9 May 2017 Date of orders: 25 May 2017 Decision date: 25 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Pembroke J Decision: See paragraphs [49], [50] and [51] Catchwords: VEXATIOUS PROCEEDINGS – policy and principle Legislation Cited: Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney-General v Barker [2007] 1 FLR 759 Bhamjee v Forsdick (No 2) [2003] EWCA 1113 Mahmoud v Attorney General of New South Wales [2017] NSWCA 12 McLaughlin v Dungowan Manly Pty Ltd (No 3) [2011] NSWSC 717 Potier v Attorney General (NSW) [2015] NSWCA 129 Viavattene v Attorney General (NSW) [2015] NSWCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Proceedings No 2016/97515 Nina Zepinic – first plaintiff Vito Zepinic (also known as Vitomir Zepinic) – second plaintiff Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited – defendant Proceedings No 2009/290598 Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited – plaintiff Milla Zepinic – first defendant Vito Zepinic (also known as Vitomir Zepinic) – second defendant Nina Zepinic – third defendant Representation: Counsel: N/A
Solicitors: Andrew Loel, Toomey Pegg Lawyers – for the defendant in 2016/097515 Andrew Loel, Toomey Pegg Lawyers – for the plaintiff in 2009/290598 No appearance for the plaintiffs in 2016/097515 No appearance for the defendants in 2009/290598 File Number(s): 2016/97515; 2009/290598
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate