NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Munday v R [2017] NSWCCA 95 Hearing dates: 2 May 2017 Date of orders: 19 May 2017 Decision date: 19 May 2017 Before: Johnson J at [1] Beech-Jones J at [2] Fagan J at [32] Decision: (1) The Applicant be granted leave to appeal. (2) The Appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCE APPEAL – possession of methylamphetamine – courier – culpability diminished because offence committed to discharge son's debt – procedural fairness – whether sentencing judge used a particular sentence in another case as yardstick – whether sentencing judge obliged to bring decision relied on to parties' attention – sentencing judge only used decision to distil matters of principle- no error shown – leave granted – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 44 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6(3) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 s 166 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 ss 10(1), 25(2) Cases Cited: Farkas v R [2014] NSWCCA 141; 243 A Crim R 388 R v JRB [2006] NSWCCA 371 Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81; 159 CLR 550 Lam v R [2014] NSWCCA 50 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 R v Gip [2006] NSWCCA 115; 161 A Crim R 173 Radi v R [2013] NSWCCA 278 RCW v R (No 2) [2014] NSWCCA 190; 244 A Crim R 541 Tweedie v R [2015] NSWCCA 71 Weir v R [2011] NSWCCA 123 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Steven John Munday (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Barrow (Applicant) H Roberts (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate