NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Callanan v NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATOD 73 Hearing dates: 3 April 2017 Date of orders: 16 May 2017 Decision date: 16 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: C Ludlow, Senior Member Decision: The decision of the delegate of the Commissioner of Police is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Commercial Agent and Private Investigator's owner operator and operator licences – fit and proper person Legislation Cited: Commercial Agents and Private Inquiry Agents Act 2004 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Police Act 1990, s 181D, s 173 cl 11(1)(c) Police Regulation 2015 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No. 2) [1955] HCA 28; (1955) 93 CLR 127 Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board 20 SASR 70 Austin v Commissioner of Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAP 179 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Callanan (Applicant) NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H El Hage (Respondent)
Solicitors: Mr G Willis (Applicant) Henry Davis York (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00378837 Publication restriction: Pursuant to an order made under s 64(1)(a) and (c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the names, positions and other information that might tend to identify the two individuals referred to as Ms A and Ms B are not to be disclosed or published.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate