NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Attorney General of NSW v Huckstadt (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 595 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 16 May 2017 Decision date: 16 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: Application for non-publication order refused. Catchwords: COURT SUPPRESSION AND NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS ACT 2010 – application by forensic patient for non-publication order on grounds in s 8(1)(a) and (e) – whether non-publication order should be made in respect of evidence given or to be given in proceedings or fact that offender may be subject to conditional release – relevance of parallel statutory scheme which applies to proceedings in Mental Health Review Tribunal – order not necessary – importance of open justice – application refused Legislation Cited: Child (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 15A Court Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), ss 6, 7, 8, 10, 12 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M, 66C, 578A Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 291 Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), s 101 Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth), s 106ZR Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 21 Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW), ss 68, 149, 151, 162, 189 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW), ss 21, 23, 24, 40, 42, 54A, Pt 5, Sch 1 National Health Act 1953 (Cth), s 135A Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Act 2009 (Vic), s 189 Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW), s 40 Cases Cited: AA v State of NSW [2013] NSWSC 1038 Attorney-General of New South Wales v Doolan [2015] NSWSC 1773 Attorney General of New South Wales v Huckstadt [2017] NSWSC 441 Attorney-General for New South Wales v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2008) 73 NSWLR 635; [2007] NSWCCA 307 Heath (a Pseudonym) v The Queen (2014) 45 VR 154; [2014] VSCA 319 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651; [2010] HCA 21 Kizon v Palmer (1997) 72 FCR 409 Matthews v R (No. 2) [2013] NSWCCA 194 Osborne v R (2014) 283 FLR 97; [2014] NSWCCA 17 Sevdalis v Director of Professional Services Review (2016) 241 FCR 266; [2016] FCA 32 State of NSW v Burns [2014] NSWSC 1014 State of NSW v Kay [2017] NSWSC 274 Voitenko t/as Access Party Hire v Zurich Australian Insurance Limited [2016] NSWSC 324 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Attorney General for the State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Allan James Huckstadt by his tutor Keith Gerard Plunkett (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Wright (Plaintiff) B Sinclair (Solicitor, Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate