NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hassid v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater [2017] NSWSC 599 Hearing dates: 5 May 2017 Date of orders: 09 May 2017 Decision date: 17 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: 1. In respect of the notice of motion filed for Rodriguez & Sons Pty Limited (Rodriguez) on 20 April 2017: (a) Order that paragraph 6(e) of the Statement of Claim filed 9 January 2017 be struck out. (b) Otherwise, motion dismissed; and (c) The plaintiffs pay the costs of Rodriguez of the motion.
2. In respect of the plaintiffs' notice of motion filed on 4 May 2017: (a) Motion dismissed; (b) The plaintiffs pay the defendants' costs of the motion.
3. On or before 10 May 2017, the plaintiffs to serve any proposed Amended Statement of Claim (proposed ASOC) on the defendants and the solicitor for Rodriguez. Any proposed ASOC is to be limited to proposed amendments to paragraph 6(c) and associated paragraphs in the Statement of Claim.
4. On or before 17 May 2017, the defendants and Rodriguez are to notify the plaintiffs as to whether each consents to an order for leave to file the proposed Amended Statement of Claim.
5. On or before 19 May 2017, the plaintiffs are to file and serve any application for leave to file the proposed ASOC (in the form provided in accordance with order 3 above), such motion to be returnable on 24 May 2017, together with their evidence in support and written submissions relied upon.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate