NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dowling v R [2017] NSWCCA 98 Hearing dates: 10 May 2017 Date of orders: 17 May 2017 Decision date: 17 May 2017 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Adamson J at [2]; Wilson J at [41] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against severity of sentence – whether the sentence was manifestly excessive –whether sentencing judge proceeded on incorrect factual basis – HELD – appeal dismissed – agreement to facts are part of plea of guilty – reduction of total effective sentence sought by applicant not in accordance with process of instinctive synthesis – no error in approach of sentencing judge in determining individual sentences or total effective sentence Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 2012 (NSW), s 5 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 51B, 95, 154C, Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 166 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s10A Cases Cited: CL v R [2014] NSWCCA 196 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 GAS v The Queen; SJK v The Queen (2004) 217 CLR 198; [2004] HCA 22 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610; [1998] HCA 57 R v Crowley [2004] NSWCCA 256 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 Weininger v The Queen (2003) 212 CLR 629; [2003] HCA 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Zachary Joel Dowling (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (Self-represented) N Williams (Regina)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate