NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tanious v Georges River Council [2017] NSWLEC 58 Hearing dates: 17 May 2017 Date of orders: 17 May 2017 Decision date: 17 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Pain J Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The Applicant is to pay the costs of the Council. (3) The exhibits be returned. Catchwords: APPEAL – s 56A appeal in relation to commissioner's decision – order limiting numbers of poultry on land made – no question of law identified – no denial of natural justice – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Local Government Act 1919 ss 124, 161, 180 Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 Cases Cited: Hoy v Coffs Harbour City Council [2015] NSWLEC 128 Stockland Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council (2004) 136 LGERA 254; [2004] NSWLEC 472 Tanious v Georges River Council [2016] NSWLEC 1330 Tanious v Georges River Council [2016] NSWLEC 142 Tanious v Georges River Council [2017] NSWLEC 1023 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mofeed Louis Tanious (Applicant) Georges River Council (Respondent) Representation: COUNSEL: M L Tanious (Applicant) M Seymour (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: N/A (Applicant) Georges River Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 17/32320 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Land and Environment Court Jurisdiction: Class 2 Citation: [2017] NSWLEC 1023 Date of Decision: 25 January 2017 Before: Morric C File Number(s): 16/155914
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate